Accès gratuit
Pré-publication électronique
Dans une revue
Douleur analg
Section Mise au point / Update
DOI https://doi.org/10.3166/dea-2020-0089
Publié en ligne 13 mai 2020
  • Hébert R (1990) Contraintes, limites et défis de l’interdisciplinarité dans les services gériatriques. Interdisciplinarité en gérontologie. Actes du 4e Congrès international francophone de gérontologie. Edisem, Saint-Hyacinthe [Google Scholar]
  • Gusdorf G (1990) Réflexions sur l’interdisciplinarité. Bull Psychol 43:869–85 [Google Scholar]
  • Payette M (2001) Interdisciplinarité : clarification des concepts. Interactions 5:19–35 [Google Scholar]
  • Plsek PE, Greenhalgh T (2001) The challenge of complexity in health care. BMJ 323:625–8 [Google Scholar]
  • Wilson T, Holt T, Greenhalgh T (2001) Complexity and clinical care. BMJ 323:685–8 [Google Scholar]
  • Engel GL (1977) The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science 196:129–36 [Google Scholar]
  • Kamper SJ, Apeldoorn AT, Chiarotto A, et al (2014) Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 9:1–163 [Google Scholar]
  • Boureau F, Dupain P, Gay MC (2000) Le modèle multidimensionnel biopsychosocial de la douleur chronique : douleurs et souffrances. Champ Psychosom 9:13–23 [Google Scholar]
  • Bishop A, Foster NE, Thomas E, et al (2008) How does the selfreported clinical management of patients with low back pain relate to the attitudes and beliefs of health care practitioners? A survey of UK general practitioners and physiotherapists. Pain 135:187–95 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Houben R, Gijsen A, Peterson J, et al (2005) Do health care providers’ attitudes towards back pain predict their treatment recommendations? Differential predictive validity of implicit and explicit attitude measures. Pain 114:491–8 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Houben RM, Ostelo RW, Vlaeyen JW, et al (2005) Health care providers’ orientations towards common low back pain predict perceived harmfulness of physical activities and recommendations regarding return to normal activity. Eur J Pain 9:173–83 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Synnott A, O’Keeffe M, Bunzli S, et al (2015) Physiotherapists may stigmatize or feel unprepared to treat people with low back pain and psychosocial factors that influence recovery: a systematic review. J Physiother 61:68–76 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Darlow B, Fullen BM, Dean S, et al (2012) The association between health care professional attitudes and beliefs and the attitudes and beliefs, clinical management, and outcomes of patients with low back pain: a systematic review. Eur J Pain 16:3–17 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gardner T, Refshauge K, Smith L, et al (2017) Physiotherapists’ beliefs and attitudes influence clinical practice in chronic low back pain: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies. J Physiother 63:132–43 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bossen JK, Hageman MG, King JD, et al (2013) Does rewording MRI reports improve patient understanding and emotional response to a clinical report? Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:3637–44 [Google Scholar]
  • Sloan TJ, Walsh DA (2010) Explanatory and diagnostic labels and perceived prognosis in chronic low back pain. Spine 35: E1120–E5 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gatchel RJ, McGeary DD, McGeary CA, et al (2014) Interdisciplinary chronic pain management: past, present, and future. Am Psychol 69:119 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Morel Fatio M, Chenani H (2019) Les pain management programmes. In: Morel Fatio M, Leroy B (eds) Réadaptation du handicap douloureux chronique. Elsevier Masson, Issy-les-Moulineaux, pp 129−45 [Google Scholar]
  • Neumann V, Gutenbrunner C, Fialka-Moser V, et al (2010) Interdisciplinary team working in physical and rehabilitation medicine. J Rehabil Med 42:4–8 [Google Scholar]
  • Morel Fatio M, Leboucq D, Poussière J, et al (2019) Pain managements programmes en internat de ville. In: Morel Fatio M, Leroy B (eds) Réadaptation du handicap douloureux chronique. Elsevier Masson, Issy-les-Moulineaux, pp 147−200 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Foster A, Croot L, Brazier J, et al (2018) The facilitators and barriers to implementing patient reported outcome measures in organizations delivering health related services: a systematic review of reviews. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2:46 [Google Scholar]
  • Berthelot JM, Nizard J, Maugars Y (2019) The negative Hawthorne effect: explaining pain overexpression. Joint Bone Spine 86:445–9 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Huyse FJ, Lyons JS, Stiefel FC, et al (1999) “INTERMED”: a method to assess health service needs: I. Development and reliability. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 21:39–48 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Marcoux V, Chouinard MC, Diadiou F, et al (2017) Screening tools to identify patients with complex health needs at risk of high use of health care services: a scoping review. PloS One 12: e0188663 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Stiefel FC, de Jonge P, Huyse FJ, et al (1999) “INTERMED”: a method to assess health service needs: II. Results on its validity and clinical use. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 21:49–56 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tüscher J, Burrus C, Vuistiner P, et al (2018) Predictive value of the fear-avoidance model on functional capacity evaluation. J Occup Rehabil 28:513–22 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Guildford BJ, Jacobs CM, Daly-Eichenhardt A, et al (2017) Assessing physical functioning on pain management programmes: the unique contribution of directly assessed physical performance measures and their relationship to self-report. Br J Pain 11:46–57 [Google Scholar]
  • Luthi F, Vuistiner P, Favre C, et al (2018) Avoidance, pacing, or persistence in multidisciplinary functional rehabilitation for chronic musculoskeletal pain: an observational study with crosssectional and longitudinal analyses. PloS One 13:e0203329 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Luthi F, Stiefel F, Gobelet C, et al (2011) Rehabilitation outcomes for orthopaedic trauma individuals as measured by the INTERMED. Disabil Rehabil 33:2544–52 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Organization WH (2001) International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. Organization WH, Geneva [Google Scholar]
  • Plomb-Holmes C, Lüthi F, Vuistiner P, et al (2017) A returnto- work prognostic model for orthopaedic trauma patients (WORRK) updated for use at 3, 12 and 24 months. J Occup Rehabil 27:568–75 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Praz C, Ducki J, Connaissa M, et al (2018) Working together and being physically active are not enough to advise uniformly and adequately low back pain patients: a cross-sectional study. Pain Res Manag 2018:4128913 [Google Scholar]
  • Choi BC, Pak AW (2007) Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 2. Promotors, barriers, and strategies of enhancement. Clin Invest Med 30:E224−E32 [Google Scholar]
  • O’Reilly P, Lee SH, O’Sullivan M, et al (2017) Assessing the facilitators and barriers of interdisciplinary team working in primary care using normalization process theory: an integrative review. PloS One 12:e0177026 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ziegelmann JP, Luszczynska A, Lippke S, et al (2007) Are goal intentions or implementation intentions better predictors of health behavior? A longitudinal study in orthopedic rehabilitation. Rehabil Psychol 52:97 [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.